Mind Control Theories and Techniques used by Mass Media

Mass media is the most powerful tool used by the ruling class to manipulate the masses. It shapes and molds opinions and attitudes and defines what is normal and acceptable. This article looks at the workings of mass media through the theories of its major thinkers, its power structure and the techniques it uses, in order to understand its true role in society.

Programming Through Mass Media

Mass media are media forms designed to reach the largest audience possible. They include television, movies, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, records, video games and the internet. Many studies have been conducted in the past century to measure the effects of mass media on the population in order to discover the best techniques to influence it. From those studies emerged the science of Communications, which is used in marketing, public relations and politics. Mass communication is a necessary tool to insure the functionality of a large democracy; it is also a necessary tool for a dictatorship. It all depends on its usage.

In the 1958 preface for A Brave New World, Aldous Huxley paints a rather grim portrait of society. He believes it is controlled by an “impersonal force”, a ruling elite, which manipulates the population using various methods.

“Impersonal forces over which we have almost no control seem to be pushing us all in the direction of the Brave New Worldian nightmare; and this impersonal pushing is being consciously accelerated by representatives of commercial and political organizations who have developed a number of new techniques for manipulating, in the interest of some minority, the thoughts and feelings of the masses.”
- Aldous Huxley, Preface to A Brave New World

His bleak outlook is not a simple hypothesis or a paranoid delusion. It is a documented fact, present in the world’s most important studies on mass media. Here are some of them:

(continue if you dare)

Psyops 101 - Internet Reverse Psychology Operations

In your search for the truth, are you being used as a pawn to do the "shadow governments" work for them? It's not like exposure hasn't been a number one concern for them since the beginning. They have think tanks of some of the most intelligent minds on the planet and billions of dollars to do the research to encompass any possible scenario and halt it before it begins. Hopefully you have taken this into account before working to expose them. If you haven't then you need to go back to square one and consider how they can and will use yourself against you without you even knowing it. It has even been passed in Congress that fake news stories and propaganda are allowed to be aired on all the news shows to the general public. You can no longer take anything at face value when dealing with the most insidious group on the planet. Unless you're a lot smarter than the average bear with a very high I.Q. and great powers of logic and deduction you more than likely have more than a few things twisted, especially when it comes to names such as Alex Jones and the lot of disinformation specialists involved in spreading the disease. It's time for you to take a step back and learn what you must unlearn. Critical thinking and the psychology of  human behavior are tools that must be an absolute when wading into the waters of deception. If it were as easy as reading a book or seeing a newsclip to get the truth, everyone would have known of the deception long ago. Strengthening your mind and the skills of your intelligence are just as important as keeping your body strong. Lies will be mixed with truth to gain your trust and have you believe more lies. Ever stop to wonder why certain things are so wholeheartedly promoted as the very face of evil itself but yet none of it points to, or gives the answers as to who? Maybe you should. Perhaps the very thing that they work so hard to have you fear and distract you with is the very thing that they are afraid of and can take them down.

Psychology operations are also known as psyops. Psyops are so amazingly effective that once they are unleashed on the unsuspecting public they start having a momentum of their own. The purpose of psyops is to disempower humanity. Once you start feeling powerless you give up and accept the results. Very few people in the world will ever know or understand what psyops are and how they affect all of us, but it is imperative that you share the information you are about to learn with everyone. This article may be the only one ever written to warn the people about this, so if you are fortunate enough to read this, then please understand that you must share this fortune of knowledge with everyone. A psyop can also be named a web of deceit, especially since they are found and spread on the internet's world wide web of deceit. The reverse psychology psyops are highly effective because good intentioned people are actually giving the psyops its effectiveness. Truthers will unknowingly spread the internet virus thinking that they are spreading the truth when the exact opposite is happening. The truthers will learn the so called hidden truths and will spread them.

Beware of the Internet Troll and Beware of the fake Truther Sites

Jump the break for more:

The Law You Won't Be Told

An old idea has resurfaced that may have major potential to slow or even reverse the terrifying erosion of the Bill of Rights. I refer to the revival of the ancient Saxon doctrine of Jury Nullification which has now become a projected Constitutional amendment under consideration in 22 states. Since Mr. Justice Brennan, the last plumb-line defender of civil liberties, has retired, and the Supreme Court seems fated to move even further toward the authoritarian right-wing, only Jury Nullification can preserve what still remains in this perishing Republic of Anglo-American libertarianism.

Jury Nullification rests upon an old Common Law principle (which Lysander Spooner in his scholarly "Essay on Trial by Jury" [1852] proved to underlie the Jury clause of Magna Carta) -- viz, that the only way to prevent the government from imposing unjust or nefarious laws is to grant juries the right to negate such laws. This right, as Spooner demonstrated, explains the tradition that a jury should consist of twelve citizens selected at random and thereby representing (as far as scientifically possible) the full range of common sense and common morality of the population in general (including the recalcitrants and cranks among us, upon whom liberty has always depended in bad times.)

In a once popular formulation, the doctrine of Jury Nullification holds that "a jury may judge the law as well as the facts in the case." Since Magna Carta this has been repeatedly upheld by courts in both England and America, only occasionally denied by lower, and currently remains the law of both countries, although judges have no legal obligations to inform juries that they possess this right.

In fact, in one infamous decision, in the 1890s, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the right of Jury Nullification but simultaneously ruled that the judge not only doesn't have to tell the jury they have this right but can prevent the defense attorney from telling them. In other words, American juries have the right to nullify the law, but the judge, if so inclined, can do everything in her or his power to prevent them from knowing it.

In only one state out of the 50 -- Maryland -- does the State Constitution oblige the judge to inform the jury that they have the right to acquit where the facts prove the defendant technically guilty but the sensibility of the jury holds that he or she did no real wrong. In the other 49 states, the right exists nebulously, like a ghost, haunting old parchments; judges do not talk about it, and juries, not knowing that they hold in their hands the final checkmate against tyranny, do not exercise the authority they possess.

As Lord Denman wrote (in O'Connel vs. Rex, 1884): "Every jury in the land is tampered with and falsely instructed by the judge when it is told that it must accept as the law that which has been given to them, or that they must bring in a certain verdict, or that they can decide only the facts of the case." Outside Maryland, every jury in America is still tampered with and falsely instructed in this manner.
The Fully Informed Jury Amendment can change all this, since it would require judges to inform juries of their right to judge the law as well as the facts and to refuse to enforce any law they find repugnant, tyrannical, nefarious, or just plain idiotic.

Jump the break for more ...

a quote from David Rockefeller

just a reminder:

--
David Rockefeller, in an

address to a Trilateral Commission meeting in June of 1991

“…..We are grateful to the Washington Post, the

New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

The New World Order Exposed

This popular conspiracy theory claims that a small group of international elites controls and manipulates governments, industry and media organisations worldwide. The primary tool they use to dominate nations is the system of central banking. They are said to have funded and in some cases caused most of the major wars of the last 200 years, primarily through carrying out false flag attacks to manipulate populations into supporting them, and have a grip on the world economy, deliberately causing inflation and depressions at will. The people behind the New World Order are thought to be international bankers, in particular the owners of the private banks in the Federal Reserve System, Bank of England and other central banks, and members of the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission and Bilderberg Group.Now, although this conspiracy theory was ridiculed for years, it turns out that the Bilderberg does meet and requests no media coverage.They receive no media coverage.The world’s elite meet every year and it goes largely unreported, for what?

Discussions at the meetings include the economy, world affairs, war and in general, world policy.After the financial collapse, the Bilderberg played a key role in proposing that the world prepare for a new world order and have a standard world currency.This was proposed shortly after by almost all attendees of the Bilderberg meeting.During the 20th century, many statesmen, such as Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, used the term "new world order" to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power after World War I and World War II.

They all saw these periods as opportunities to implement idealistic or liberal proposals for global governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address worldwide problems that go beyond the capacity of individual nation-states to solve. These proposals led to the creation of international organizations, such as the United Nations and N.A.T.O., and international regimes, such as the Bretton Woods system and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which were calculated both to maintain a balance of power as well as regularize cooperation between nations, in order to achieve a peaceful phase of capitalism.

In the aftermath of the two World Wars, progressives welcomed these new international organizations and regimes but argued they suffered from a democratic deficit and therefore were inadequate to not only prevent another global war but also foster global justice. American banker David Rockefeller joined the Council on Foreign Relations as its youngest-ever director in 1949 and subsequently became chairman of the board from 1970 to 1985; today he serves as honorary chairman. In 2002, Rockefeller authored his autobiography Memoirs wherein, on page 405, he wrote:

"For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents ... to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

Thus, activists around the globe formed a world federalist movement bent on creating a "real" new world order. A number of Fabian socialist intellectuals, such as British writer H. G. Wells in the 1940s, appropriated and redefined the term "new world order" as a synonym for the establishment of a full-fledged social democratic world government.In the 1960s, a great deal of right-wing conspiracy attention, by groups like the John Birch Society and the Liberty Lobby, focused on the United Nations as the vehicle for creating the "One World Government", and contributed to a conservative movement for United States withdrawal from the U.N.. American writer Mary M. Davison, in her 1966 booklet The Profound Revolution, traced the alleged New World Order conspiracy to the creation of the U.S. Federal Reserve System in 1913 by international bankers, who she claimed later formed the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921 as the shadow government. At the time the booklet was published, "international bankers" would have been interpreted by many readers as a reference to a postulated "international banking conspiracy" masterminded by the Rothschilds and Rockefellers.American televangelist Pat Robertson with his 1991 best-selling book The New World Order became the most prominent Christian popularizer of conspiracy theories about recent American history as a theater in which Wall Street, the Federal Reserve System, Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg Group, and Trilateral Commission control the flow of events from behind the scenes, nudging us constantly and covertly in the direction of world government under the rule of "the elite."

After the turn of the century, specifically during the financial crisis of 2007–2009, many politicians and pundits, such as Gordon Brown, Henry Kissinger, and Barack Obama, used the term "new world order" in their advocacy for a Keynesian reform of the global financial system and their calls for a "New Bretton Woods", which takes into account emerging markets such as China and India. These declarations had the unintended consequence of providing fresh fodder for New World Order conspiracism, and culminated in former Clinton administration adviser Dick Morris and conservative talk show host Sean Hannity arguing on one of his Fox News Channel programs that "conspiracy theorists were right".


In 2009, American film directors Luke Meyer and Andrew Neel released New World Order, a critically-acclaimed documentary film which explores the world of conspiracy theorists who are committed to exposing and vigorously opposing what they perceive to be an emerging New World Order.

May 24, 1992 

God Secretly Loves Ugly People

God secretly loves ugly people, SCRIPTURE SAYS SO.

“He had no beauty or majesty to attract us to him, nothing in his appearance that we should desire him…Like one from whom men hid their faces he was despised and we esteemed him not.” 
Isaiah 53:2, 3b



According to authors Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, a recently discovered text known as the "Slavonic Josephus" escaped Roman censorship.

What did Jesus look like?

According to the Slavonic Josephus, Jesus was "a man of simple appearance, mature age, dark skin, small stature, three cubits high, hunchbacked with a long face, long nose, and meeting eyebrows, so that they who see him might be affrighted, with scanty hair with a parting in the middle of his head, after the manner of the Nazarites, and with an undeveloped beard."

"Three cubits high," write Knight and Lomas, would mean Jesus was less than four feet, six inches tall!

They point out a passage in Luke 19:3 which, due to its ambiguity, got past the censors:

 "And he sought to see Jesus who he was; and he could not for the crowd, because he was low of stature." Who was "low of stature", the man seeking a glimpse of Jesus, or Jesus himself?

A balding, hunchbacked dwarf did not fit the Greek conception of a god, and so Jesus was packaged by Paul of Tarsus and the Hellenized Romans, and turned into a six-foot tall, fair haired man.

Since Paul’s time the Catholic Church has systematically "packaged" Christianity. "The early Roman Church set about the task of destroying everything that did not meet its required dogma."


The atheists and agnostics complain, "Where is the historical Jesus?" The answer is that the "almost total absence of references to [the historical] Jesus is due to the knives of the censors..."

French conman Pierre Plantard Confesses

In 1965, French conman Pierre Plantard confessed to planting forgeries of historical documents in France’s national library to perpetuate myths he had created about the Priory of Sion. These myths, just a few decades later, inspired books like Holy Blood Holy Grail and The Da Vinci Code, not to mention a whole septic leak of mainstream conspiracy theories and a deluge of subconsciously accepted “what ifs.”